<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ACCT Blog &#187; Cancer Decisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acct-blog.com/tag/cancer-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acct-blog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:20:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Mammography Debate, Part II</title>
		<link>http://acct-blog.com/2009/11/30/the-mammography-debate-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://acct-blog.com/2009/11/30/the-mammography-debate-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ACCT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mammography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mammography debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ph.D.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph W. Moss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acct-blog.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mammography Debate, Part II
Written by Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D.
Cancer Decisions

&#8220;Barbara Brenner of the San Francisco-based group, Breast Cancer Action (BCA), is one of the rare leaders who has come out in support of the USPSTF recommendations. She says that the new recommendations would simply bring the US in line with most European countries, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mammography Debate, Part II<br />
Written by <em>Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D.</em><br />
<em><a title="Cancer Decisions - The Mammography Debate, Part II" href="http://www.cancerdecisions.com/content/view/322/2/lang,english/" target="_blank">Cancer Decisions<br />
</a></em><br />
&#8220;Barbara Brenner of the San Francisco-based group, Breast Cancer Action (BCA), is one of the rare leaders who has come out in support of the USPSTF recommendations. She says that the new recommendations would simply bring the US in line with most European countries, and hailed the USPSTF panel&#8217;s results. A BCA spokesperson told me that they have been deluged with comments from their members, not all of them supportive. (Note: I am a scientific advisor to Breast Cancer Action.) A lot of people are really upset by the loss of security that mammography provides.&#8221;</p>
<p><a title="The Mammography Debate Part II" href="http://www.cancerdecisions.com/content/view/322/2/lang,english/" target="_blank">Click here to read complete article at Cancer Decisions website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acct-blog.com/2009/11/30/the-mammography-debate-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
